ID Card Forensics

The verdict combines up to three independent checks, each scoring the image on a 0–100 risk scale:

• Content analysis — are the card's design, text and security features internally consistent for the era/type it claims?
• Pixel forensics — any sign of digital manipulation (AI generation, splicing, edited metadata)? (runs only when enabled)
• Layout integrity — do the fixed printed elements sit where a genuine template places them?

The overall verdict is the highest risk any single check raises — a document is treated as suspicious if any check fires, so one strong signal is never averaged away. The line under the stamp shows how many checks contributed.

• LOW (under 40) — no forgery signals; the checks that ran agree the document is consistent.
• MEDIUM (40–69) — one unclear or partial signal; worth a human look.
• HIGH (70+) — a strong forgery signal, or several checks agree.

The percentage next to the era/type is classification confidence, not risk — e.g. 95% means the system is 95% sure of the design era it assigned. A genuine card typically shows high confidence and a LOW verdict: confident about what the document is, and nothing wrong with it.